You are here

319 Watershed Success Story: Owl Creek Watershed Project

Publication Number: P4022
View as PDF: P4022.pdf

What Is a 319 Watershed Project?

Originating from the 1987 amendments to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Clean Water Act (CWA), Section 319 established the Nonpoint Source Management Program. Section 319 provides federal funding to help focus state and local nonpoint source pollution mitigation efforts. In Mississippi, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is the lead agency for the development and implementation of the 319 program, which is dedicated to protecting and restoring the state’s water resources. The program provides financial assistance to other state agencies, local governments, universities, and nonprofit organizations to implement nonpoint source pollution projects.

Project Overview

Owl Creek watershed is located in Tippah County in northeast Mississippi, covering 25,740 acres. The watershed includes various land use types, including agricultural lands, pasturelands, and forested areas. Owl Creek watershed was a candidate for restoration due to identified impairments from nonpoint source sediment pollution.

On agricultural land in the watershed, soil erosion was identified as a major resource concern for landowners and operators.

With high interest from stakeholders and its history of being listed on the state’s 303(d) list as an impaired and threatened water body, Owl Creek-Little Hatchie River watershed was selected as a priority watershed by the MDEQ basin team.

With coordination from Tippah County Soil and Water Conservation District and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) staff, 28 landowners implemented 282 best management practices (BMPs) to improve agricultural land and reduce erosion to improve water quality in Owl Creek.

Project Goals

  1. Improve water quality and protect high-quality waters by implementing BMPs within the targeted watershed area.
  2. Apply BMPs to agricultural lands in the project area, to reach the desired outcome of reduced nutrient and sediment runoff and livestock access to streams.
  3. Reduce pollutant loading from agricultural nonpoint sources.
  4. Inform and educate the public about BMPs that benefit water quality.

Resource Concerns

Small grassy hill with exposed dirt.
Figure 1. Gully erosion into streams.
Red sediment flows into a cloudy puddle of water.
Figure 2. Sediment runoff in waterways.

Owl Creek has a designated use of fish and wildlife support. After biological impairment was identified in 2010, sediment was identified as the most probable nonpoint source pollutant of concern in Owl Creek, resulting from runoff into receiving waters by several in-channel processes (mass wasting, head cutting, gullying, and sheet and rill erosion). While sources of sediments can include a variety of land-use activities, agricultural practices were identified as a pollutant source where low-cost BMPs could mitigate nonpoint source sediment pollution. Local agencies worked with producers to determine which BMPs were feasible to implement into operations without impacting productivity.

The images below demonstrate sediment resource concerns in agricultural landscapes before implementing BMPs, while the after images (taken about 8 months later) highlight conservation implementation and mitigation of sediment transport.

Before

Figure 3A before: Eroded ground with an exposed drainage pipe and pools of water.
Figure 3A. Ditch and culvert drainage caused severe land erosion.
Figure 4A before: A ditch has muddy water and an eroded bank with green grass and weeds.
Figure 4A. Ditch and creek bank erosion.
Figure 5A before: A field with a deep trench with significant dirt eroding on both sides.
Figure 5A. Gullies with erosion.

After

Figure3B after: A ditch features shrubs and minimal water from a drainage pipe. A fence stands on the right of the ditch. Farther down the ditch, a wide strip of rocks crosses it.
Figure 3B. Fence exclusions, check dam rock structure, and streambank protection.
Figure 4B after: A ditch is covered with large gray rocks from the bottom to the bank.
Figure 4B. Streambank protection using rock structures.
Figure 5B after: A deep trench with a wide strip of rocks crossing it.
Figure 5B. Check dam rock structure.

Impacts

Through the Owl Creek Watershed Project, the local Soil and Water Conservation District and NRCS assisted with the design and implementation of 282 conservation practices, working with 28 different landowners. Models predict that these practices will reduce nonpoint sources of pollution by 4,137 tons (8.27 million pounds) of sediment, 9.45 tons (18,904 pounds) of nitrogen, and 3.15 tons (6,303 pounds) of phosphorus in the watershed.

*Load reductions were calculated using EPA’s Region 5 Load Reduction Model and include practices implemented from 2019 to 2024.

Stakeholder involvement and voluntary conservation adoption is a key component to the success of watershed projects.

A group of people gathers in a clearing.
Figure 6. Landowners at a field day event.

Project partners used cost-effective materials and conservation practices to ensure more practices were implemented to assist more landowners and mitigate erosion throughout the watershed.

A concrete walkway and fencing in a field.
Figure 7. Fence exclusion and concreted heavy-use-area protection of a watershed stream.

Partnerships

Watershed projects are uniquely collaborative and strategic approaches to coordinating resources and addressing watershed concerns. The open dialogue with landowners and producers throughout the process helps to identify conservation practices that provide a win-win scenario for the landowners and the environment overall.

Partners include:

  • Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • Mississippi Soil and Water Conservation Commission
  • Tippah County Soil and Water Conservation District
  • USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Want to Learn More?


This material is based upon work supported by the U.S. EPA, under sponsor award agreement number 00D87719.

Publication 4022 (POD-09-24)

By Edward D. Entsminger, PhD, Extension Associate III, and Beth Baker, PhD, Associate Extension Professor, Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The Mississippi State University Extension Service is working to ensure all web content is accessible to all users. If you need assistance accessing any of our content, please email the webteam or call 662-325-2262.

Authors

Portrait of Dr. Beth Harlander Baker
Associate Extension Professor
Portrait of Dr. Edward D. Entsminger
Extension Associate III

Your Extension Experts

Portrait of Dr. Beth Harlander Baker
Associate Extension Professor
Portrait of Mr. James Thomas Callicutt
Extension Instructor I
Portrait of Dr. Daryl Jones
Extension Professor
Portrait of Dr. Adam Rohnke
Assistant Extension Professor